AI-Powered Legal Intelligence

Legal Research AIPowered by Advanced Intelligence

Revolutionize your legal research with AI-powered case law analysis, instant precedent discovery, and comprehensive legal intelligence. Find relevant cases, statutes, and legal insights in seconds, not hours.

Instant Case Search

Search millions of cases with natural language queries

Precedent Analysis

Discover relevant precedents and legal authorities

Multi-Jurisdiction

Research across federal, state, and international law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Search millions of cases using natural language queries. Our AI understands legal concepts and finds the most relevant precedents for your research.

Legal Research Query
Try these examples:
Filters

Jurisdiction

1247
892
743
634

Date Range

Court Level

Search Results
3 results found
0.8s

Smith v. Johnson Manufacturing Corp.

245 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2021)

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit3/15/2021Federal
95% relevant
Cited 127 times

Landmark case establishing new standards for contract breach remedies in commercial disputes. Court held that consequential damages must be reasonably foreseeable at time of contract formation.

Key Holdings:

  • Consequential damages require foreseeability at contract formation
  • Mitigation duty applies to all commercial contract breaches
  • Liquidated damages clauses subject to reasonableness test
Contract Law
breach of contract
damages

California Tech Solutions v. DataCorp Inc.

89 Cal. App. 5th 456 (2021)

California Court of Appeal, First District7/22/2021California
88% relevant
Cited 43 times

California appellate court decision on software licensing disputes and breach of contract remedies. Established precedent for calculating lost profits in technology contracts.

Key Holdings:

  • Lost profits calculable in software licensing disputes
  • Specific performance available for unique software
  • Attorney fees recoverable under Civil Code ยง 1717
Technology Law
software licensing
lost profits

United Industries v. Pacific Manufacturing

156 F. Supp. 3d 789 (N.D. Cal. 2020)

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California11/8/2020Federal
82% relevant
Cited 67 times

Federal district court analysis of contract interpretation and breach remedies in manufacturing agreements. Important precedent for supply chain contract disputes.

Key Holdings:

  • Contract ambiguities construed against drafter
  • Cover damages available for substitute goods
  • Force majeure clauses narrowly interpreted
Commercial Law
manufacturing contracts
contract interpretation
AI-Powered Precedent Intelligence

Legal Precedent Analysis & Citation Networks

Understand the precedential value and citation relationships of legal cases. Our AI analyzes precedent strength, judicial treatment, and legal principle evolution.

95%
Precedent Strength
Based on citation frequency and judicial treatment
127
Citation Network
Cases citing this precedent
12
Jurisdictional Reach
Jurisdictions following this precedent
+15%
Trend Analysis
Citation growth over last 2 years
Precedent Evolution Chain
1

Hadley v. Baxendale

9 Ex. 341 (1854)

1854
100
Relationship: Foundational precedent
Influence: Established foreseeability rule
2

Victoria Laundry v. Newman Industries

[1949] 2 KB 528

1949
88
Relationship: Refined application
Influence: Clarified reasonable contemplation test
3

Koufos v. C. Czarnikow Ltd.

[1969] 1 AC 350

1969
85
Relationship: Further development
Influence: Distinguished degrees of probability
4

Smith v. Johnson Manufacturing Corp.

245 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2021)

2021
95
Relationship: Current application
Influence: Modern commercial context application
Recent Citing Cases

TechCorp v. DataSystems Inc.

156 F.4th 234 (9th Cir. 2022)

Followed
92% relevant

Applied Smith standard to software licensing disputes

Global Manufacturing v. Supply Chain Ltd.

89 F. Supp. 3d 567 (N.D. Cal. 2022)

Distinguished
78% relevant

Distinguished Smith in international commerce context

California Enterprises v. Pacific Corp.

234 Cal. App. 5th 123 (2023)

Followed
85% relevant

State court adoption of Smith reasoning

Legal Principles

Foreseeability Requirement

Consequential damages must be reasonably foreseeable at contract formation

Strength:Strong
Applications:15 cases
Trend:Stable

Mitigation Duty

Non-breaching party must take reasonable steps to minimize damages

Strength:Strong
Applications:23 cases
Trend:Expanding

Reasonable Contemplation Test

Damages must be within reasonable contemplation of parties

Strength:Moderate
Applications:8 cases
Trend:Evolving
Case Authority
95%
Authority Strength
Authority Type:
Binding
Jurisdiction:Ninth Circuit
Citation Count:127 cases
Multi-Jurisdictional Research

Jurisdiction-Specific Legal Research

Research legal precedents across federal, state, and international jurisdictions. Our AI understands jurisdictional nuances and provides targeted research results for your specific legal context.

Federal Courts

U.S. Federal court system including Supreme Court, Circuit Courts, and District Courts

California

California state courts including Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and Superior Courts

New York

New York state courts including Court of Appeals, Appellate Division, and trial courts

International

International courts, tribunals, and foreign jurisdictions

Research Statistics
2.4M+
Total Cases
45,230
Recent Cases
100%
Coverage
Daily
Updates

Research Features

  • Supreme Court decisions
  • Circuit court precedents
  • District court rulings
  • Federal agency decisions
Legal Specialties
Constitutional Law
166+ cases
Federal Criminal Law
779+ cases
Interstate Commerce
871+ cases
Federal Civil Rights
250+ cases
Immigration Law
418+ cases
Bankruptcy Law
332+ cases
Notable Cases

Brown v. Board of Education

347 U.S. 483 (1954)

Constitutional Law
Landmark

Miranda v. Arizona

384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Criminal Procedure
Landmark

Advanced Research Capabilities

Our AI-powered research tools help you navigate complex jurisdictional landscapes and find the most relevant legal authorities.

Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis

Compare legal approaches across different jurisdictions

  • Identify jurisdictional differences
  • Find favorable venues
  • Understand conflict of laws

Precedent Mapping

Visualize how precedents flow between jurisdictions

  • Track precedent adoption
  • Identify influential cases
  • Predict legal trends

Real-Time Updates

Stay current with the latest legal developments

  • Daily case updates
  • Breaking legal news
  • Trend notifications
Jurisdiction Comparison Matrix
JurisdictionTotal CasesUpdate FrequencyCoverageSpecialties
Federal Courts
2.4M+Daily100%6
California
890K+Daily100%6
New York
743K+Daily100%6
International
156K+Weekly85%6
Comprehensive Legal Intelligence

Advanced Legal Research Features

Our AI-powered legal research platform combines cutting-edge technology with comprehensive legal databases to deliver unparalleled research capabilities.

50M+
Legal Documents
2.8M+
Search Queries
85%
Research Time Saved
97.3%
Accuracy Rate

Natural Language Search

Search legal databases using plain English queries. Our AI understands legal concepts and terminology.

  • Intuitive search interface
  • Legal concept recognition
  • Context-aware results

AI-Powered Analysis

Advanced machine learning models analyze case relevance, precedent strength, and legal relationships.

  • Relevance scoring
  • Precedent analysis
  • Legal relationship mapping

Comprehensive Database

Access millions of cases, statutes, regulations, and legal documents across multiple jurisdictions.

  • Multi-jurisdictional coverage
  • Real-time updates
  • Historical archives

Citation Networks

Visualize citation relationships and precedent chains to understand legal authority and influence.

  • Citation mapping
  • Precedent tracking
  • Authority analysis

Advanced Filtering

Refine search results by jurisdiction, date, court level, legal area, and citation frequency.

  • Multi-dimensional filtering
  • Custom search criteria
  • Saved search profiles

Legal Trend Analysis

Identify emerging legal trends, evolving precedents, and shifts in judicial interpretation.

  • Trend identification
  • Predictive insights
  • Market intelligence

Precedent Strength

Evaluate the precedential value of cases based on citation frequency, judicial treatment, and authority.

  • Authority scoring
  • Treatment analysis
  • Precedent validation

Research Insights

Get AI-generated summaries, key holdings, and strategic insights for your legal research.

  • Automated summaries
  • Key holding extraction
  • Strategic recommendations

Real-Time Updates

Stay current with the latest legal developments, new cases, and regulatory changes.

  • Daily updates
  • Breaking news alerts
  • Trend notifications

Comprehensive Research Coverage

Access the most comprehensive legal database with coverage across all areas of law and multiple jurisdictions.

Case Law Research

  • Federal and state case law
  • International court decisions
  • Administrative law decisions
  • Arbitration awards

Statutory Research

  • Federal and state statutes
  • Municipal codes
  • Regulatory materials
  • Legislative history

Secondary Sources

  • Law review articles
  • Legal encyclopedias
  • Practice guides
  • Legal news and analysis

International Law

  • Treaty databases
  • International court decisions
  • Foreign law materials
  • Comparative law analysis

How AI Legal Research Works

Our streamlined research process leverages AI to deliver comprehensive results faster than traditional legal research methods.

1

Query Input

Enter your research question in natural language

  • Natural language processing
  • Legal concept recognition
  • Query optimization
2

AI Analysis

AI analyzes millions of legal documents for relevance

  • Semantic search
  • Relevance scoring
  • Context analysis
3

Result Ranking

Results ranked by relevance, authority, and precedent strength

  • Authority scoring
  • Precedent analysis
  • Citation weighting
4

Insights Generation

AI generates summaries, insights, and recommendations

  • Automated summaries
  • Key holdings
  • Strategic insights
Research Impact

Transforming Legal Research Worldwide

Our AI-powered legal research platform is helping legal professionals find better precedents, save time, and deliver superior legal analysis.

2.8M+
Research Queries
Legal research queries processed monthly
450K+
Time Saved
Hours saved by legal professionals
95%
Case Discovery
Relevant cases found that manual search missed
97.3%
Research Accuracy
Accuracy rate for legal research results
Start Your Research Journey

Ready to Revolutionize Your Legal Research?

Join thousands of legal professionals who trust OpusLaw for AI-powered legal research. Find relevant cases, analyze precedents, and discover legal insights with unprecedented speed and accuracy.

No credit card required
Instant access to 50M+ documents
Free research trial

85% Time Reduction

Complete research in minutes, not hours

Comprehensive Coverage

Access 50M+ legal documents and cases

Precedent Intelligence

Understand case authority and citation networks

Trusted by Legal Professionals Worldwide

4.9/5 from 4,100+ reviews

โ€œOpusLaw's research AI finds cases I would have missed. It's like having a research librarian with perfect memory working 24/7.โ€

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธ
Jennifer Walsh
Senior Associate, BigLaw Firm

โ€œI can now compete with large firms on research quality. The AI finds relevant precedents in seconds that used to take me hours.โ€

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ผ
Marcus Thompson
Solo Practitioner

โ€œThe precedent analysis and citation networks are incredible for academic research. It's revolutionizing how we study legal evolution.โ€

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿซ
Dr. Sarah Kim
Law Professor, Stanford

Experience AI Legal Research

Try our AI-powered legal research with a sample query. See how quickly you can find relevant cases, analyze precedents, and discover legal insights.